| Sacks | INTs | Fum Rec | Defensive TDs | Fantasy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_sack.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_int.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_fum_rec.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.def_tds.toFixed(1) : '0'}} | {{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection[selectedScoringConfig.fantasyPtsKey].toFixed(1) : '0'}} |
What moves do you need to make this week in fantasy football? From lineup strategy to free agent pickups to DFS, our experts give you moves to make before Week 14
Read More »
Isaac Guerendo became THE GUY on waiver wires this week. How much will you need to bid to get him, though? And who else is worth targeting?
Read More »Titans Waste $21 Million on Cody Barton
Titans Waste $21 Million on Cody Barton
The Titans have agreed to a three-year, $21 million deal with LB Cody Barton, NFL Network reports. That should install the former Bronco as the starter next to LB Kenneth Murray, unless Tennessee decides to dump him ahead of the second year on his contract.
Kenneth Murray Active but Risky
Kenneth Murray Active but Risky
Titans LB Kenneth Murray Jr. is active for today's game against the Colts. He makes for a risky IDP option, though, after missing all three practices with the hamstring injury that kept him out two weeks ago. Murray did return last week to play 94% of defensive snaps against the Bengals, though.
Jerome Baker a Healthy Scratch
Jerome Baker a Healthy Scratch
Titans LB Jerome Baker is inactive for today's game against the Bengals. He carried no injury designation into the weekend, so that indicates the veteran is a healthy scratch.
| Week | Team | SOS | Fantasy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
|
CHI |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[1], 1, 1)}} |
|
2 |
|
@ NYJ |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[2], 2, 1)}} |
|
3 |
|
@ GB |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[3], 3, 1)}} |
|
4 |
|
MIA |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[4], 4, 1)}} |
|
5 |
BYE |
|||
|
6 |
|
@ IND |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[6], 6, 1)}} |
|
7 |
|
BUF |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[7], 7, 1)}} |
|
8 |
|
DET |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[8], 8, 1)}} |
|
9 |
|
@ NE |
46.5% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[9], 9, 1)}} |
|
10 |
|
LAC |
-30.7% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[10], 10, 1)}} |
|
11 |
|
@ MIN |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[11], 11, 1)}} |
|
12 |
|
HOU |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[12], 12, 1)}} |
|
13 |
|
WAS |
-21.6% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[13], 13, 1)}} |
|
14 |
|
@ JAC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[14], 14, 1)}} |
|
15 |
|
@ CIN |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[15], 15, 1)}} |
|
16 |
|
IND |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[16], 16, 1)}} |
|
17 |
|
JAC |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[17], 17, 1)}} |
|
18 |
|
@ HOU |
0% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[18], 18, 1)}} |
Search
Tennessee Titans's Preseason Player Analysis
Bottom Line