Rec
{{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.rec_catch.toFixed(1) : '0'}}
Rec Yds
{{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.rec_yds.toFixed(1) : '0'}}
Rec TDs
{{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection.rec_tds.toFixed(1) : '0'}}
Fantasy Pts
{{fullPreSeasonProjection ? fullPreSeasonProjection[selectedScoringConfig.fantasyPtsKey].toFixed(1) : '0'}}
Forty Yard Dash
4.59
Forty Yard Dash Rank
91%
Three Cone Drill
6.91
Agility Score
11.16
Agility Score Rank
90%
Burst Score
122.80
Burst Score Rank
76%
Spar Qx
111.70
Spar Qx Rank
68%
Speed Score
108.40
Speed Score Rank
85%
Catch Radius
10.15
Catch Radius Rank
78%
Week | Team | SOS | Fantasy | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
@ LAR |
16% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[1], 1, 1)}} |
2 |
|
@ TB |
14.8% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[2], 2, 1)}} |
3 |
|
ARI |
-14.3% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[3], 3, 1)}} |
4 |
|
@ SEA |
0.1% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[4], 4, 1)}} |
5 |
BYE |
|||
6 |
|
DAL |
-15.6% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[6], 6, 1)}} |
7 |
|
MIN |
9.1% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[7], 7, 1)}} |
8 |
|
@ TEN |
-15.8% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[8], 8, 1)}} |
9 |
|
GB |
6.3% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[9], 9, 1)}} |
10 |
|
HOU |
-7.2% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[10], 10, 1)}} |
11 |
|
@ JAC |
20.9% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[11], 11, 1)}} |
12 |
|
IND |
37.4% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[12], 12, 1)}} |
13 |
|
@ CHI |
6.1% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[13], 13, 1)}} |
14 |
|
@ GB |
6.3% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[14], 14, 1)}} |
15 |
|
@ BUF |
-8.7% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[15], 15, 1)}} |
16 |
|
CHI |
6.1% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[16], 16, 1)}} |
17 |
|
SF |
-16.4% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[17], 17, 1)}} |
18 |
|
@ MIN |
9.1% |
{{getWeeklyRankDisplayValue(scheduleWeeklyRanks[18], 18, 1)}} |
Our Thoughts
Sam LaPorta's Preseason Player Analysis
Bottom Line
The fantasy case for LaPorta is easy to build. The argument against him: He might be going too early. He tied for third at the position in PPR points per game last year despite a 4-TD lead on the field. And Mark Andrews jumps ahead if you remove the game he left early with his knee injury. Early ADP has LaPorta going first at the position – often a half-round ahead of the next TE. He could certainly score that way. But that starting point means more downside risk and opportunity cost to drafting him. We’d rather wait another round and a half or more and take Mark Andrews.
What We Learned Last Year
What to Expect in 2024